Skip to content

Conversation

@rtificr
Copy link

@rtificr rtificr commented Dec 5, 2024

NUL -> NULL

@rustbot
Copy link
Collaborator

rustbot commented Dec 5, 2024

Thanks for the pull request, and welcome! The Rust team is excited to review your changes, and you should hear from @Noratrieb (or someone else) some time within the next two weeks.

Please see the contribution instructions for more information. Namely, in order to ensure the minimum review times lag, PR authors and assigned reviewers should ensure that the review label (S-waiting-on-review and S-waiting-on-author) stays updated, invoking these commands when appropriate:

  • @rustbot author: the review is finished, PR author should check the comments and take action accordingly
  • @rustbot review: the author is ready for a review, this PR will be queued again in the reviewer's queue

@rustbot rustbot added S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. T-libs Relevant to the library team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. labels Dec 5, 2024
/// and platform-native string values, and in particular allowing a Rust string
/// to be converted into an "OS" string with no cost if possible. A consequence
/// of this is that `OsString` instances are *not* `NUL` terminated; in order
/// of this is that `OsString` instances are *not* `NULL` terminated; in order
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

NUL is the correct spelling. Wikipedia: Null character.

@Noratrieb
Copy link
Member

As pointed out by @Kijewski, this is correct. Thank you for the PR anyways :)

@Noratrieb Noratrieb closed this Dec 7, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. T-libs Relevant to the library team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants